Is the countryside racist? Villages 'that want to remain white and middle class'

MrDoodles wrote:

Yet again eilzel you are wrong!

We WERE forced to accept mass immigration by Liebour, just as a nasty "Social Experiment" "To teach the Tories a lesson"

No one had a choice, it wasn't in any manifesto, they did it without any mandate for the electorate, to try and swell the ranks of Liebour voters to try and cling to power and the sheeple are just stupid enough, to vote them in again at the next Election!

Just have to ask you MrD, in which disaster aftermath would you have wanted to have found yourself in.....

Hurricane Katrina or the Japanese earthquake and tsunami, there's two wildly different "cultural" responses to a disaster

Seren wrote:

Just have to ask you MrD, in which disaster aftermath would you have wanted to have found yourself in.....

Hurricane Katrina or the Japanese earthquake and tsunami, there's two wildly different "cultural" responses to a disaster

Sorry Seren, but WTF, has that got to do with the subject matter?

eilzel wrote:

In many ways things were better then Sprite- but do you honestly think immigration is the main problem behind all those things?

Population growth would have occured anyway, we'd still have a population over 60 million with or without immigration and population growth is the biggest cost by far.

Also, I never suggested your parents were homophobic or racist. Would they have liked their home town/village LESS if a gay couple moved in?

OF COURSE immigration is the main problem behind all these things. A close second is the way we copied America's economics - running everything on credit and countries being brought down by moneylenders.

As to the homophobia bit, just where does this come into anything? gay people were part of the community when I grew up in the 60s and were just accepted; they had no need to shout about it, I can't understand where this comes in, but I grew up in Chelsea so maybe it was different up north!

Japanese society is very much Japanese still. As a nation they have not allowed mass third world immigration and by the standards of the report in this thread they would be labelled racist.

Yet in the aftermath of the disaster there has been no looting, violent attacks on victims, rioting, shootings. No just citizens pulling together as a community.

Multi-cultural societies lose that sense of community spirit. As seen in the aftermath of hurricane katrina. Looting, shooting and violent attacks.

White communities arming themselves and preventing blacks from escaping through their neighborhoods. People firing guns at rescuers.

Within the conference centre, the few white survivors there had to be rescued themselves.

Multi-culturism is too fragile and breaks easily under any stress.

Even Merkel and mandelson now say this so don't just take my word for it.

Spot on Seren.

Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

White Lightning wrote:Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

Nobody has said any such thing. Nobody has agreed with unlimited immigration and the rest is meaningless after that.

sassy1261 wrote:Nobody has said any such thing. Nobody has agreed with unlimited immigration and the rest is meaningless after that.

Sure they do. They're always gloating in the media about how soon whites will be the minority in white countries. Name one white country that doesn't have the policy of non-white immigration and assimilation. Anti-whites agree that every white country and only white countries has to open its borders to millions of third worlders and assimilate with them. It's genocide under international law.

White Lightning wrote:

Sure they do. They're always gloating in the media about how soon whites will be the minority in white countries. Name one white country that doesn't have the policy of non-white immigration and assimilation. Anti-whites agree that every white country and only white countries has to open its borders to millions of third worlders and assimilate with them. It's genocide under international law.

You'll never get the Lefty Liberals to see your point WL, as far as they are concerned, we should all be living in a wonderful multicultural utopia, where all traces of white English Culture and Heritage, are replaced by something more "vibrant"!