Teen Raped As She Walks Home From School

Probably not the "enrichment" she was hoping to get from Mass Immigration!

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-News/Police-Hunt-On-For-Man-After-13-Year-Old-Teenage-Girl-From-Manchester-Alleges-Attack-And-Rape/Article/201105315993749?lpos=UK_News_Second_Home_Page_Article_Teaser_Region_4&lid=ARTICLE_15993749_Police_Hunt_On_For_Man_After_13-Year-Old_Teenage_Girl_From_Manchester_Alleges_Attack_And_Rape

You are totally obsessed Mr D, I am beginning to think it is an illness. Rape is disgusting, whoever does it, but you must search for these things to find the ones that are by immigrants.

Maths teacher, 41, who raped and sexually assaulted teenage pupils is jailed for 15 yearsBy Daily Mail Reporter

Last updated at 11:49 AM on 17th May 2011

Sex-obsessed: Anthony Dockerty, who was jailed for 15 years, sent 150 Facebook messages to one girl while grooming her
A paedophile maths teacher who repeatedly raped a 16-year-old girl he met at the school where he worked has been jailed for 15 years.

Anthony Dockerty, 41, raped one girl, sexually assaulted another 15-year-old and groomed a third teenager when he 'bombarded' her with explicit Facebook messages.

The 'sex-obsessed domineering bully', who was head of maths at Winifred Holtby School in Bransholme, Hull, sent one pupil more than 150 indecent messages on the social networking site.
A court heard Dockerty, who regularly took cocaine, ecstacy and viagra, abused his position of trust to target teenage girls by plying them with alcohol.

The predatory teacher made one girl dress up in her uniform for him, as well as buying her nightwear and telling her he fantasised about her.

After admitting she had a 'crush' on him, the father-of-four lured the girl to his home, when it was only by chance that a friend saw the pair's Facebook conversation and alerted police.

Dockerty had been urging his victim to delete the Facebook messages to ensure he would not get caught.

Hull Crown Court had previously heard the teacher sent 40 messages to a female pupil in one day.

He told a 15-year-old girl: 'You are excellent at school, so bright' and 'You are far more grown up than some of the other girls


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1387930/Maths-teacher-41-raped-sexually-assaulted-teenage-pupils-jailed-15-years.html#ixzz1MhRVFA8w

There is a picture with it.

I expect that was not the 'enrichment' their parents wanted when they sent them to school.

And you are the true PC Lefty Liberal, that makes excuses for ANY act by "Imports" and then start trawling the net, to find a similar crime (in your eyes) committed by someone indigenous to this Country!

You epitomise the anti-white, self loathing, Lefty apologist, that has created the way the Country now is!

MrDoodles wrote:And you are the true PC Lefty Liberal, that makes excuses for ANY act by "Imports" and then start trawling the net, to find a similar crime (in your eyes) committed by someone indigenous to this Country!

You epitomise the anti-white, self loathing, Lefty apologist, that has created the way the Country now is!

Does it never occur to you that you are very insulting when I always try to counter your points with information etc. I don't loathe white, I love just about everybody, I don't apologise for anything. I total condemn all crimes, violence, terrorism etc no matter who does it. I did not have to trawl the net, there are thousands on there, it was the very first one that came up when I put in 'girl raped'. If you posted stuff about all crime we could have a decent discussion, but every time you complain there is always a coloured face behind it, its an obsession I am sure. I really don't want to fight with you Mr D, because anyone who loves his wife as much as you do can't be all bad, but I am sick of your insults and totally bored with the 'lets hate all immigrants' posts. I don't call you a right wing facist, perhaps I should start, but I really don't want to descend so I would be most grateful if you could refrain in future.

sassy1261 wrote:

I always try to counter your points with information etc.

So saying that I'm "totally obsessed" and "I am beginning to think it is an illness" is "countering points with information"?

Righto!

Having read both sides of the discussion, I will add my contribution. I do not believe that Mr D is totally obsessed with the very real immigrant problems, his opinion is as relevant as any other posters. Likewise I don't think Sassy is as totally pro- multicultural and anti English as she comes over. There is, at the moment a huge rift between those who see the Liebour party's policy of uncontrolled immigration as detramental to the wellbeing of the UK and those who purport to be from the Liberal lefty crowd who cheer when the the customs and lifestyle which has served the UK well over the centuries are destroyed. Those lefties want all our taxpayer's money to go to foreign countries and praise those who arrange the transfer of our monies. Wheras the normal British people are fed up with Westminster putting the interests of foreigners before our own indigenous people.

fred bloggs wrote:Having read both sides of the discussion, I will add my contribution. I do not believe that Mr D is totally obsessed with the very real immigrant problems, his opinion is as relevant as any other posters. Likewise I don't think Sassy is as totally pro- multicultural and anti English as she comes over. There is, at the moment a huge rift between those who see the Liebour party's policy of uncontrolled immigration as detramental to the wellbeing of the UK and those who purport to be from the Liberal lefty crowd who cheer when the the customs and lifestyle which has served the UK well over the centuries are destroyed. Those lefties want all our taxpayer's money to go to foreign countries and praise those who arrange the transfer of our monies. Wheras the normal British people are fed up with Westminster putting the interests of foreigners before our own indigenous people.

"anti English as she comes over" Sassy, nor any other LWer I know even comes across as anti-English.

"who cheer when the the customs and lifestyle which has served the UK well over the centuries are destroyed" No one cheers when our customs or lifestyle is destroyed. Incidentally this statement is wrong on two counts. As it isn't being destroyed to begin with.

"want all our taxpayer's money to go to foreign countries" No one wants that, most are critical of the amount we give in foreign aid, though most who support the 0.7% we give, do so with good reasons.

Pure isolationist tosh as usual...

fred bloggs wrote:Having read both sides of the discussion, I will add my contribution. I do not believe that Mr D is totally obsessed with the very real immigrant problems, his opinion is as relevant as any other posters. Likewise I don't think Sassy is as totally pro- multicultural and anti English as she comes over. There is, at the moment a huge rift between those who see the Liebour party's policy of uncontrolled immigration as detramental to the wellbeing of the UK and those who purport to be from the Liberal lefty crowd who cheer when the the customs and lifestyle which has served the UK well over the centuries are destroyed. Those lefties want all our taxpayer's money to go to foreign countries and praise those who arrange the transfer of our monies. Wheras the normal British people are fed up with Westminster putting the interests of foreigners before our own indigenous people.

I don't have a problem with people talking about the real problems of immigration. We have areas were we have too much of a concentration of immigrants, probably because when they first came to this country they felt safer being all together. Lord knows we do it to when we go to live abroad. Immigration needs to be cut back because we cannot have unending numbers, we are simply too small. I don't support the Labour party. I totally resent that because I don't want people repatriated etc that I cheer when the customs and lifestyle is destroyed and I don't think it has been destroyed and there is nothing anti English about that. As I said, we have a few area where large concentrations of immigrants means that a lot has changed, but travel round the country and most of it is exactly the same as it always was. I am a normal person as are people who think like me. The ones we find abnormal (and from the election results we are in a HUGE majority) are people who whinge on all the time about the 'indigenous' people. We are the indigenous people. We have the blood of Celts and Romans, Saxon and Gauls, Dutch and Viking, Caribbean and Asian all mixed together as has always been the way. Of course we need to look after our own people, but people who are now citizens ARE our own people. If we make them feel unaccepted, if we make them feel second class citizens, if we make them feel they are despised, then they will turn against us instead of integrating. I have people of all creeds and colours around me. They are former immigrants who have now completely integrated. We are a community, no one is inferior because of their background. That is why, when Mr D continuously posts about anything he can find where an immigrant is concerned, and calls them 'enrichers' it makes my blood boil. If he posted about a crime he found appalling, whatever the colour of the persons skin, or their background, I would discuss it with him. However, he doesn't. He picks out the ones that means he can be derogatory about immigrants and glosses over those by the so called 'indigenous'. When people disagree with him, they are always 'looney lefties'. I happen to think that those in the BNP etc are totally off their trolleys in a very nasty way, but I don't keep calling him a 'looney right wing'. We were supposed to be able to discuss without insults, but that seems to be being forgotten.

Finally, it is fine to put ourselves first most of the time, but occasionally we have to remember we are human beings first, on Planet Earth and we cannot ignore the rest of the world and would be very stupid to do so. What affects one part of the world soon affects another, we cannot live in isolation.

sassy1261 wrote:


I don't have a problem with people talking about the real problems of immigration. We have areas were we have too much of a concentration of immigrants, probably because when they first came to this country they felt safer being all together. Lord knows we do it to when we go to live abroad. Immigration needs to be cut back because we cannot have unending numbers, we are simply too small. I don't support the Labour party. I totally resent that because I don't want people repatriated etc that I cheer when the customs and lifestyle is destroyed and I don't think it has been destroyed and there is nothing anti English about that. As I said, we have a few area where large concentrations of immigrants means that a lot has changed, but travel round the country and most of it is exactly the same as it always was. I am a normal person as are people who think like me. The ones we find abnormal (and from the election results we are in a HUGE majority) are people who whinge on all the time about the 'indigenous' people. We are the indigenous people. We have the blood of Celts and Romans, Saxon and Gauls, Dutch and Viking, Caribbean and Asian all mixed together as has always been the way. Of course we need to look after our own people, but people who are now citizens ARE our own people. If we make them feel unaccepted, if we make them feel second class citizens, if we make them feel they are despised, then they will turn against us instead of integrating. I have people of all creeds and colours around me. They are former immigrants who have now completely integrated. We are a community, no one is inferior because of their background. That is why, when Mr D continuously posts about anything he can find where an immigrant is concerned, and calls them 'enrichers' it makes my blood boil. If he posted about a crime he found appalling, whatever the colour of the persons skin, or their background, I would discuss it with him. However, he doesn't. He picks out the ones that means he can be derogatory about immigrants and glosses over those by the so called 'indigenous'. When people disagree with him, they are always 'looney lefties'. I happen to think that those in the BNP etc are totally off their trolleys in a very nasty way, but I don't keep calling him a 'looney right wing'. We were supposed to be able to discuss without insults, but that seems to be being forgotten.

Finally, it is fine to put ourselves first most of the time, but occasionally we have to remember we are human beings first, on Planet Earth and we cannot ignore the rest of the world and would be very stupid to do so. What affects one part of the world soon affects another, we cannot live in isolation.

Did they not teach you about "paragraphs" at school sassy?

I know that it was a "stone and slate" in your day, but it does make it very difficult to read your posts without them!

MrDoodles wrote:

Did they not teach you about "paragraphs" at school sassy?

I know that it was a "stone and slate" in your day, but it does make it very difficult to read your posts without them!

I know all about paragraphs Mr D, you use them when you change a subject or your thoughts or what you are writing about or your direction etc. The first paragraph was about the same thing, therefore should not have gone into another until I changed on to another point, which I did. Paragraphs can be long and short you know, depending on how detailed you are writing on one subject.

No stone and slate Mr D, although I did start with inkwells and dip in pens, biro's were not allowed.

PS, was it too hard for you to read and reply to the points, rather than just saying a long paragraph makes it difficult to read. How do you manage books? They have much longer paragraphs.

Hi Sassy I thought we had an agreement that we would not use the words Loony Lefties on this forum. I have stood by this agreement, but I see by your post that you have started using the term again as in your post QUOTE :- "they are always 'looney lefties" UNQUOTE. -- As you have decided to recind our agreement I therefore feel no obligation to carry on with what we agreed.

So it's back to calling the Anti British, Immigration loving, Nat/ Socialists Loony lefties again I see.

sassy1261 wrote:

I know all about paragraphs Mr D, you use them when you change a subject or your thoughts or what you are writing about or your direction etc. The first paragraph was about the same thing, therefore should not have gone into another until I changed on to another point, which I did. Paragraphs can be long and short you know, depending on how detailed you are writing on one subject.

No stone and slate Mr D, although I did start with inkwells and dip in pens, biro's were not allowed.

PS, was it too hard for you to read and reply to the points, rather than just saying a long paragraph makes it difficult to read. How do you manage books? They have much longer paragraphs.

I started with fountain pens at Grammar School and always had to have a bottle of "Quink" with me and like you, Biro's were banned and TBH, my hand writing was MUCH better then!

I take your point about sassy about paragraphs, however, we are on an internet forum, NOT an English exam and it does make it easier to read, if you put some more in!

After all, I'd hate people not to read your posts, because they looked hard to read!

fred bloggs wrote:Hi Sassy I thought we had an agreement that we would not use the words Loony Lefties on this forum. I have stood by this agreement, but I see by your post that you have started using the term again as in your post QUOTE :- "they are always 'looney lefties" UNQUOTE. -- As you have decided to recind our agreement I therefore feel no obligation to carry on with what we agreed.

So it's back to calling the Anti British, Immigration loving, Nat/ Socialists Loony lefties again I see.

I do hope that was said tongue in cheek Fred, as you know perfectly well I was quoting Mr D to try and stop him using it all the time.

I'm peed off enough already, don't you start!

sassy1261 wrote:

I do hope that was said tongue in cheek Fred, as you know perfectly well I was quoting Mr D to try and stop him using it all the time.

I'm peed off enough already, don't you start!

Unless you can post me a Link, I don't EVER re-call calling you a "Looney" Lefty as you put it!

sassy1261 wrote:

I do hope that was said tongue in cheek Fred, as you know perfectly well I was quoting Mr D to try and stop him using it all the time.

I'm peed off enough already, don't you start!

Just adding a little light hearted humour to the discussion Sassy as is my want. The question has to be asked though!. Why the downhearted Sassy and not the usual upbeat gal ?. Your statement, "I'm peed off enough already", is not your usual response, could it be that you are being been influenced by other more viciferous L/W posters and you are uncomfortable with their ultra L/W views. Remember Sassy, this is only an anonymous forum don't let other people's views get to you, none of it matters.